Difference Between an Affiliate and a Subsidiary
Table of Contents
Affiliate vs a Subsidiary
The business world is chock full of terms ordinary people may find confusing. A good example of words that often get interchanged or are not understood at all are ‘affiliate’ and ‘subsidiary’. These words appear in TV advertisements, posters, bank statements, and yet most people don’t know how to differentiate between the two. These terms are also mentioned in the stock market and trading floors as business parlance. However, most people are oblivious to the exact meaning of these terms, except for businessmen, stockbrokers, and investors. As a result, people freely mention these terms in everyday conversations and even in formal debates without knowing that they may be using them incorrectly. The two terms share only one similarity: both affiliates and subsidiaries are measurements of ownership that a main company holds over other, smaller companies. However, the similarities end there. A company that acts as a subsidiary to the main company has a major share of its stocks controlled by the main company. There are even cases where the main company controls all of the stocks of a subsidiary.
On the other hand, an affiliate company only holds a minor share of its stocks controlled by the main company. For example, the major company Walt Disney Corporation has an eighty-percent stake on ESPN, forty-percent stake on History Channel, and complete ownership of stocks of the Disney Channel. In this example, Walt Disney has stakes over three smaller companies, thus enabling the categorization of these companies either as subsidiary or affiliate. History Channel would be categorized as an affiliate, because Walt Disney Corporation only has a partial, or forty percent, control of its stocks. However, ESPN can be said to be a subsidiary of Walt Disney Corporation, since the majority of its stocks are controlled by the main company. Lastly, Disney Channel can be branded as a wholly owned subsidiary, since Walt Disney Corporation owns a hundred percent of its stocks.
There are cases wherein an affiliate company is not directly under the main company, but instead a partner company that simply shares its stocks with the main company. Affiliate companies may also possess subsidiary companies in which they control a majority or a hundred percent of stocks. Multinational corporations create subsidiaries and affiliates to proliferate host countries without having to stake their name, or in the case of affiliates, a major share of their stocks. There are countries where certain multinational corporations do not operate well because they are perceived as purveyors of capitalism and foreign investment. In such scenarios, multinational companies create subsidiaries or affiliates in order to secretly penetrate a target market. Some subsidiary and affiliate companies have been branded as ‘dummy companies’ which are in fact companies owned by a huge, main company in order to enter a market hostile to their brand name. This strategy is termed as foreign direct investment. Aside from multinational corporations, banks also adopt the foreign direct investment tactic in order to adjust to a target country’s banking regulations, while at the same time still allowing them to issue insurance policies.
Summary
ncG1vJloZrCvp2OxqrLFnqmeppOar6bA1p6cp2aemsFwrtSsoKedo6h8pbXFn5yrnZ6Ysm6uxK2unp2eYq6vecCfnaKkmZbBpnnAp5tmmV2owqO%2FyJ2gmqqpZA%3D%3D